AI Visibility Platform

When buyers ask AI, it names
your competitors. Not you.

Instly Scout measures how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude answer the questions your buyers actually ask, then does the work to get you named, and proves it moved. That is the monthly program, a managed AEO/GEO service we run from Bangkok, Thailand. The free scan and the $49.99 audit below are tools: they check whether AI can read your site.

Start with a free homepage surface x-ray: technical signals only, no signup.

Checks public homepage structure, metadata, schema, crawler access and image labels.

That's the surface preview. Continue with this exact domain for the full AI visibility audit of your homepage: every measured check with its evidence, the AI's reading, and the fixes. It does not include the AI answer check. Verify your email, then proceed to secure checkout.

Prefer a multi-page browser scan? Install the Chrome extension (desktop Chrome only) See a real before and after

We'll email your scan, then a few short emails about it (about one every two days, five at most). Unsubscribe any time. How we use your email.

2–4×more visits to AI-recommended brands
9.5B +70%monthly AI visits, year over year
5×growth in cited answers in under a year
58.8%of AI referrals land on homepages

Source: Similarweb, 2026 Generative AI Landscape.

The shift

Search is becoming answers. People act on the two or three brands the AI names.

How the answer check works

Five questions. Four engines. Twenty answers.

In the monthly program, Scout runs five buying questions in your category across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Each run reads twenty AI answers and records whether each answer names you and which pages each engine cites, plus a list of other brands the answers name.

20
AI answers per run
5 questions × 4 engines
1
Category
your market & buyers
1
Verdict
named · cited · ranked
The loop

Measure. Diagnose. Act. Prove. Maintain.

Most tools stop at a score. Scout closes the loop: it does the work, proves the movement, and keeps watching. The loop closing is the whole argument.

1

Measure

4 engines: who is named, who is cited, which sources they read

2

Diagnose

The questions you lose, sources you're missing

3

Act

You approve; agents write and fix

4

Prove

Dated before and after, same questions, same engines

5

Maintain

Re-measured on request; every drop and gain dated

Always on the button
A human approves
every publish.
336 articles. 801 URLs.
Named in 0 of 20 AI answers.

Content investment was real. Citations weren't. More of the same would not have fixed it.

A real client measurement. Anonymised pending sign-off. Re-measured on request; it read 1 of 20 the day before it read 0.

Start free. The program does the work.

The homepage surface x-ray is free, forever. The monthly program, our managed service for AI search visibility, does the work for you: $500/mo founding rate (regular $1,200).

FAQ

Straight answers.

Does anything publish without me?

No. Agents draft content and prepare fixes; every asset waits on a human approval before it goes live. Measurement runs when you ask for it; publishing never happens without you.

Which engines do you measure?

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, each through its provider's API with web search on, and we record the sources each one cites. The consumer apps can answer differently.

What if the score doesn't move?

The 90-day guarantee: no movement and month three is refunded, and you keep everything we produced. We show our own scores swinging day to day; the trend is what we hold ourselves to.

How is this different from an SEO tool?

SEO tools measure blue-link rankings. Scout measures whether AI answers name and cite you: a different surface with different rules. It also fixes and proves, not just reports.